Skip to: Content | Footer

California Postsecondary Education Data Home Page

College-Going Rates by Congressional District

1992 College-Going Rates to Public Colleges and Universities

This table provides college-going rates for Congressional districts in California. College-going rates were calculated by dividing the number of entering students from public schools in the district by the total number of graduates from public schools in the district. All categories of public schools are covered including comprehensive schools, continuation schools, and other categories of schools. Students with unknown genders and ethnicities and those from unknown schools were excluded from the data.

Data regarding high school graduates were obtained from the California Department of Education. Data for higher education enrollment were obtained from each of the segments and includes all students -- full-time, part-time, credit, and non-credit.

Note that the calculation of these rates is based on totals for each category such as year, district, and ethnicity. Rates do not entail longitudinal tracking of individual students.

Click on the column label for one of the public systems to see a chart of the data below.

Click on the the district number and member for a chart showing the trend over time for that district..

Important note: The data for first-time students have changed. See Changes to First-Time Freshmen and College-Going Data for more details.

Data collection for Fall 2009 is in progress. As a result, more recent data than what is displayed may be available for some systems. Visit the Custom Data Reports for the most up-to-date data. Select the year needed from the drop-down list at the top of the options. Visit the Dates Available for availability for each type of data. The Sources and Timing of Data page has an approximate schedule for each type of data the Commission collects.

  High School
Graduates
First-Time Students College-Going Rate
Congressional District Public UC CSU CCC Total UC CSU CCC Total
1 - Mike Thompson 5,015 282 314 1,608 2,204 5.6% 6.3% 32.1% 43.9%
2 - Wally Herger 5,330 139 328 1,708 2,175 2.6% 6.2% 32.0% 40.8%
3 - Daniel E. Lungren 5,112 249 287 2,037 2,573 4.9% 5.6% 39.8% 50.3%
4 - Tom McClintock 5,130 180 259 1,870 2,309 3.5% 5.0% 36.5% 45.0%
5 - Doris O. Matsui 3,535 164 183 1,313 1,660 4.6% 5.2% 37.1% 47.0%
6 - Lynn C. Woolsey 4,285 364 294 1,739 2,397 8.5% 6.9% 40.6% 55.9%
7 - George Miller 4,271 201 244 1,701 2,146 4.7% 5.7% 39.8% 50.2%
8 - Nancy Pelosi 2,254 136 392 724 1,252 6.0% 17.4% 32.1% 55.5%
9 - Barbara Lee 3,281 312 329 1,239 1,880 9.5% 10.0% 37.8% 57.3%
10 - John Garamendi 5,056 444 329 2,022 2,795 8.8% 6.5% 40.0% 55.3%
11 - Jerry McNerney 5,834 352 416 2,644 3,412 6.0% 7.1% 45.3% 58.5%
12 - Jackie Speier 4,312 475 370 1,659 2,504 11.0% 8.6% 38.5% 58.1%
13 - Fortney Pete Stark 5,157 374 451 2,100 2,925 7.3% 8.7% 40.7% 56.7%
14 - Anna G. Eshoo 3,394 455 228 1,069 1,752 13.4% 6.7% 31.5% 51.6%
15 - Michael M. Honda 5,198 456 441 2,216 3,113 8.8% 8.5% 42.6% 59.9%
16 - Zoe Lofgren 4,652 292 478 1,779 2,549 6.3% 10.3% 38.2% 54.8%
17 - Sam Farr 4,845 277 317 1,748 2,342 5.7% 6.5% 36.1% 48.3%
18 - Dennis A. Cardoza 4,953 132 321 1,810 2,263 2.7% 6.5% 36.5% 45.7%
19 - Jeff Denham 5,331 181 456 2,140 2,777 3.4% 8.6% 40.1% 52.1%
20 - Jim Costa 5,021 117 369 1,549 2,035 2.3% 7.3% 30.9% 40.5%
21 - Devin Nunes 5,532 128 333 2,216 2,677 2.3% 6.0% 40.1% 48.4%
22 - Kevin McCarthy 5,184 159 275 1,706 2,140 3.1% 5.3% 32.9% 41.3%
23 - Lois Capps 3,741 208 163 1,112 1,483 5.6% 4.4% 29.7% 39.6%
24 - Elton Gallegly 5,997 376 256 991 1,623 6.3% 4.3% 16.5% 27.1%
25 - Buck McKeon 4,690 164 163 1,520 1,847 3.5% 3.5% 32.4% 39.4%
26 - David Dreier 5,789 546 455 1,756 2,757 9.4% 7.9% 30.3% 47.6%
27 - Brad Sherman 3,569 277 315 1,393 1,985 7.8% 8.8% 39.0% 55.6%
28 - Howard L. Berman 3,255 222 253 1,104 1,579 6.8% 7.8% 33.9% 48.5%
29 - Adam B. Schiff 5,129 423 472 1,945 2,840 8.2% 9.2% 37.9% 55.4%
30 - Henry A. Waxman 4,660 621 385 1,654 2,660 13.3% 8.3% 35.5% 57.1%
31 - Xavier Becerra 1,974 129 259 637 1,025 6.5% 13.1% 32.3% 51.9%
32 - Judy Chu 4,962 221 348 1,490 2,059 4.5% 7.0% 30.0% 41.5%
33 - Karen Bass 3,789 217 345 1,288 1,850 5.7% 9.1% 34.0% 48.8%
34 - Lucille Roybal-Allard 4,874 182 456 1,275 1,913 3.7% 9.4% 26.2% 39.2%
35 - Maxine Waters 3,270 119 326 1,169 1,614 3.6% 10.0% 35.7% 49.4%
36 -  Vacant District 36 4,291 378 312 1,645 2,335 8.8% 7.3% 38.3% 54.4%
37 - Laura Richardson 3,146 186 230 894 1,310 5.9% 7.3% 28.4% 41.6%
38 - Grace F. Napolitano 6,412 342 515 1,816 2,673 5.3% 8.0% 28.3% 41.7%
39 - Linda T. Sánchez 5,574 304 404 1,778 2,486 5.5% 7.2% 31.9% 44.6%
40 - Edward R. Royce 5,766 477 456 1,842 2,775 8.3% 7.9% 31.9% 48.1%
41 - Jerry Lewis 4,758 185 260 599 1,044 3.9% 5.5% 12.6% 21.9%
42 - Gary G. Miller 5,160 484 446 1,456 2,386 9.4% 8.6% 28.2% 46.2%
43 - Joe Baca 4,229 101 209 810 1,120 2.4% 4.9% 19.2% 26.5%
44 - Ken Calvert 4,456 295 236 1,007 1,538 6.6% 5.3% 22.6% 34.5%
45 - Mary Bono Mack 3,931 174 110 1,099 1,383 4.4% 2.8% 28.0% 35.2%
46 - Dana Rohrabacher 5,883 580 303 2,380 3,263 9.9% 5.2% 40.5% 55.5%
47 - Loretta Sanchez 3,805 216 179 1,527 1,922 5.7% 4.7% 40.1% 50.5%
48 - John Campbell 4,907 622 299 1,861 2,782 12.7% 6.1% 37.9% 56.7%
49 - Darrell E. Issa 3,894 148 134 1,082 1,364 3.8% 3.4% 27.8% 35.0%
50 - Brian P. Bilbray 5,299 515 303 2,123 2,941 9.7% 5.7% 40.1% 55.5%
51 - Bob Filner 5,475 257 305 2,046 2,608 4.7% 5.6% 37.4% 47.6%
52 - Duncan Hunter 5,236 294 310 2,387 2,991 5.6% 5.9% 45.6% 57.1%
53 - Susan Davis 3,140 175 188 1,242 1,605 5.6% 6.0% 39.6% 51.1%
Statewide Total 243,743 15,307 16,809 83,525 115,641 6.3% 6.9% 34.3% 47.4%
Other College-Going Rate Options

College-Going Rates Menu

 

Looking for other Commission data?

Visit Where to Find Data for quick links sorted by the type of data.

Want to reproduce a pre-configured data report?

Visit Reproduce Pre-Configured Report for available instructions.

Instructions for the following report(s) on this page are available:

How to Cite this Information

See Citing Information on the Terms of Use page for some suggestions.

See something weird?

Known problems and notes about the data are documented on the Caveats page. Please let us know if you notice something that is not included. Send an e-mail to Data_Quality@cpec.ca.gov or fill out the Comments form.