Skip to: Content | Footer

California Postsecondary Education Data Home Page

College-Going Rates by Congressional District

1993 College-Going Rates to Public Colleges and Universities

This table provides college-going rates for Congressional districts in California. College-going rates were calculated by dividing the number of entering students from public schools in the district by the total number of graduates from public schools in the district. All categories of public schools are covered including comprehensive schools, continuation schools, and other categories of schools. Students with unknown genders and ethnicities and those from unknown schools were excluded from the data.

Data regarding high school graduates were obtained from the California Department of Education. Data for higher education enrollment were obtained from each of the segments and includes all students -- full-time, part-time, credit, and non-credit.

Note that the calculation of these rates is based on totals for each category such as year, district, and ethnicity. Rates do not entail longitudinal tracking of individual students.

Click on the column label for one of the public systems to see a chart of the data below.

Click on the the district number and member for a chart showing the trend over time for that district..

Important note: The data for first-time students have changed. See Changes to First-Time Freshmen and College-Going Data for more details.

Data collection for Fall 2009 is in progress. As a result, more recent data than what is displayed may be available for some systems. Visit the Custom Data Reports for the most up-to-date data. Select the year needed from the drop-down list at the top of the options. Visit the Dates Available for availability for each type of data. The Sources and Timing of Data page has an approximate schedule for each type of data the Commission collects.

  High School
Graduates
First-Time Students College-Going Rate
Congressional District Public UC CSU CCC Total UC CSU CCC Total
1 - Mike Thompson 5,065 315 301 1,693 2,309 6.2% 5.9% 33.4% 45.6%
2 - Wally Herger 5,323 119 321 1,619 2,059 2.2% 6.0% 30.4% 38.7%
3 - Daniel E. Lungren 4,934 253 345 1,983 2,581 5.1% 7.0% 40.2% 52.3%
4 - Tom McClintock 5,265 162 261 1,979 2,402 3.1% 5.0% 37.6% 45.6%
5 - Doris O. Matsui 3,794 174 263 1,566 2,003 4.6% 6.9% 41.3% 52.8%
6 - Lynn C. Woolsey 4,125 343 248 1,551 2,142 8.3% 6.0% 37.6% 51.9%
7 - George Miller 4,072 182 205 1,461 1,848 4.5% 5.0% 35.9% 45.4%
8 - Nancy Pelosi 2,302 182 406 670 1,258 7.9% 17.6% 29.1% 54.6%
9 - Barbara Lee 3,405 340 296 1,261 1,897 10.0% 8.7% 37.0% 55.7%
10 - John Garamendi 5,034 450 297 1,746 2,493 8.9% 5.9% 34.7% 49.5%
11 - Jerry McNerney 5,947 338 350 2,663 3,351 5.7% 5.9% 44.8% 56.3%
12 - Jackie Speier 4,502 500 350 1,798 2,648 11.1% 7.8% 39.9% 58.8%
13 - Fortney Pete Stark 4,943 370 457 1,903 2,730 7.5% 9.2% 38.5% 55.2%
14 - Anna G. Eshoo 3,472 434 240 1,074 1,748 12.5% 6.9% 30.9% 50.3%
15 - Michael M. Honda 5,429 486 319 2,464 3,269 9.0% 5.9% 45.4% 60.2%
16 - Zoe Lofgren 4,905 295 466 1,750 2,511 6.0% 9.5% 35.7% 51.2%
17 - Sam Farr 4,382 251 312 1,466 2,029 5.7% 7.1% 33.5% 46.3%
18 - Dennis A. Cardoza 5,123 142 283 1,592 2,017 2.8% 5.5% 31.1% 39.4%
19 - Jeff Denham 5,517 176 515 2,076 2,767 3.2% 9.3% 37.6% 50.2%
20 - Jim Costa 5,204 108 386 1,546 2,040 2.1% 7.4% 29.7% 39.2%
21 - Devin Nunes 5,624 165 328 2,228 2,721 2.9% 5.8% 39.6% 48.4%
22 - Kevin McCarthy 5,285 110 278 1,730 2,118 2.1% 5.3% 32.7% 40.1%
23 - Lois Capps 3,876 231 144 1,555 1,930 6.0% 3.7% 40.1% 49.8%
24 - Elton Gallegly 6,004 370 219 2,440 3,029 6.2% 3.6% 40.6% 50.4%
25 - Buck McKeon 4,818 169 148 1,454 1,771 3.5% 3.1% 30.2% 36.8%
26 - David Dreier 5,769 587 462 1,625 2,674 10.2% 8.0% 28.2% 46.4%
27 - Brad Sherman 3,709 287 329 1,251 1,867 7.7% 8.9% 33.7% 50.3%
28 - Howard L. Berman 3,407 232 213 1,044 1,489 6.8% 6.3% 30.6% 43.7%
29 - Adam B. Schiff 5,203 432 467 1,942 2,841 8.3% 9.0% 37.3% 54.6%
30 - Henry A. Waxman 4,778 556 289 1,786 2,631 11.6% 6.0% 37.4% 55.1%
31 - Xavier Becerra 1,986 184 254 597 1,035 9.3% 12.8% 30.1% 52.1%
32 - Judy Chu 5,044 253 380 1,350 1,983 5.0% 7.5% 26.8% 39.3%
33 - Karen Bass 3,698 191 357 1,215 1,763 5.2% 9.7% 32.9% 47.7%
34 - Lucille Roybal-Allard 5,361 192 425 1,470 2,087 3.6% 7.9% 27.4% 38.9%
35 - Maxine Waters 3,453 124 286 1,153 1,563 3.6% 8.3% 33.4% 45.3%
36 -  Vacant District 36 4,101 346 276 1,676 2,298 8.4% 6.7% 40.9% 56.0%
37 - Laura Richardson 3,329 173 262 1,099 1,534 5.2% 7.9% 33.0% 46.1%
38 - Grace F. Napolitano 6,540 315 474 1,730 2,519 4.8% 7.2% 26.5% 38.5%
39 - Linda T. Sánchez 5,728 309 422 1,866 2,597 5.4% 7.4% 32.6% 45.3%
40 - Edward R. Royce 5,741 463 425 2,361 3,249 8.1% 7.4% 41.1% 56.6%
41 - Jerry Lewis 4,824 195 259 1,367 1,821 4.0% 5.4% 28.3% 37.7%
42 - Gary G. Miller 5,287 502 447 1,643 2,592 9.5% 8.5% 31.1% 49.0%
43 - Joe Baca 4,516 126 269 990 1,385 2.8% 6.0% 21.9% 30.7%
44 - Ken Calvert 4,783 315 254 571 1,140 6.6% 5.3% 11.9% 23.8%
45 - Mary Bono Mack 4,182 192 114 892 1,198 4.6% 2.7% 21.3% 28.6%
46 - Dana Rohrabacher 6,037 568 296 2,377 3,241 9.4% 4.9% 39.4% 53.7%
47 - Loretta Sanchez 4,147 216 226 1,758 2,200 5.2% 5.4% 42.4% 53.1%
48 - John Campbell 4,861 640 267 1,763 2,670 13.2% 5.5% 36.3% 54.9%
49 - Darrell E. Issa 3,638 138 128 1,111 1,377 3.8% 3.5% 30.5% 37.9%
50 - Brian P. Bilbray 5,368 536 308 1,847 2,691 10.0% 5.7% 34.4% 50.1%
51 - Bob Filner 5,848 289 329 2,331 2,949 4.9% 5.6% 39.9% 50.4%
52 - Duncan Hunter 5,347 295 307 2,298 2,900 5.5% 5.7% 43.0% 54.2%
53 - Susan Davis 3,360 202 205 893 1,300 6.0% 6.1% 26.6% 38.7%
Statewide Total 248,395 15,523 16,468 85,274 117,265 6.2% 6.6% 34.3% 47.2%
Other College-Going Rate Options

College-Going Rates Menu

 

Looking for other Commission data?

Visit Where to Find Data for quick links sorted by the type of data.

Want to reproduce a pre-configured data report?

Visit Reproduce Pre-Configured Report for available instructions.

Instructions for the following report(s) on this page are available:

How to Cite this Information

See Citing Information on the Terms of Use page for some suggestions.

See something weird?

Known problems and notes about the data are documented on the Caveats page. Please let us know if you notice something that is not included. Send an e-mail to Data_Quality@cpec.ca.gov or fill out the Comments form.