Skip to: Content | Footer

California Postsecondary Education Data Home Page

College-Going Rates by Congressional District

1994 College-Going Rates to Public Colleges and Universities

This table provides college-going rates for Congressional districts in California. College-going rates were calculated by dividing the number of entering students from public schools in the district by the total number of graduates from public schools in the district. All categories of public schools are covered including comprehensive schools, continuation schools, and other categories of schools. Students with unknown genders and ethnicities and those from unknown schools were excluded from the data.

Data regarding high school graduates were obtained from the California Department of Education. Data for higher education enrollment were obtained from each of the segments and includes all students -- full-time, part-time, credit, and non-credit.

Note that the calculation of these rates is based on totals for each category such as year, district, and ethnicity. Rates do not entail longitudinal tracking of individual students.

Click on the column label for one of the public systems to see a chart of the data below.

Click on the the district number and member for a chart showing the trend over time for that district..

Important note: The data for first-time students have changed. See Changes to First-Time Freshmen and College-Going Data for more details.

Data collection for Fall 2009 is in progress. As a result, more recent data than what is displayed may be available for some systems. Visit the Custom Data Reports for the most up-to-date data. Select the year needed from the drop-down list at the top of the options. Visit the Dates Available for availability for each type of data. The Sources and Timing of Data page has an approximate schedule for each type of data the Commission collects.

  High School
Graduates
First-Time Students College-Going Rate
Congressional District Public UC CSU CCC Total UC CSU CCC Total
1 - Mike Thompson 5,286 295 381 1,639 2,315 5.6% 7.2% 31.0% 43.8%
2 - Wally Herger 5,496 141 353 1,608 2,102 2.6% 6.4% 29.3% 38.2%
3 - Daniel E. Lungren 5,026 255 370 1,923 2,548 5.1% 7.4% 38.3% 50.7%
4 - Tom McClintock 5,337 166 359 1,965 2,490 3.1% 6.7% 36.8% 46.7%
5 - Doris O. Matsui 3,805 185 292 1,573 2,050 4.9% 7.7% 41.3% 53.9%
6 - Lynn C. Woolsey 4,004 347 306 1,406 2,059 8.7% 7.6% 35.1% 51.4%
7 - George Miller 4,409 220 275 1,403 1,898 5.0% 6.2% 31.8% 43.0%
8 - Nancy Pelosi 2,253 218 465 598 1,281 9.7% 20.6% 26.5% 56.9%
9 - Barbara Lee 3,305 327 327 1,279 1,933 9.9% 9.9% 38.7% 58.5%
10 - John Garamendi 5,213 471 358 1,754 2,583 9.0% 6.9% 33.6% 49.5%
11 - Jerry McNerney 6,169 299 460 2,419 3,178 4.8% 7.5% 39.2% 51.5%
12 - Jackie Speier 4,593 504 457 1,740 2,701 11.0% 9.9% 37.9% 58.8%
13 - Fortney Pete Stark 5,113 393 441 1,915 2,749 7.7% 8.6% 37.5% 53.8%
14 - Anna G. Eshoo 3,335 412 226 1,034 1,672 12.4% 6.8% 31.0% 50.1%
15 - Michael M. Honda 5,426 549 385 2,398 3,332 10.1% 7.1% 44.2% 61.4%
16 - Zoe Lofgren 4,996 350 470 1,760 2,580 7.0% 9.4% 35.2% 51.6%
17 - Sam Farr 4,406 262 344 1,536 2,142 5.9% 7.8% 34.9% 48.6%
18 - Dennis A. Cardoza 5,507 166 323 2,037 2,526 3.0% 5.9% 37.0% 45.9%
19 - Jeff Denham 5,406 190 553 2,108 2,851 3.5% 10.2% 39.0% 52.7%
20 - Jim Costa 5,077 117 380 1,564 2,061 2.3% 7.5% 30.8% 40.6%
21 - Devin Nunes 5,855 169 397 2,196 2,762 2.9% 6.8% 37.5% 47.2%
22 - Kevin McCarthy 5,389 127 330 1,684 2,141 2.4% 6.1% 31.2% 39.7%
23 - Lois Capps 3,734 255 168 1,463 1,886 6.8% 4.5% 39.2% 50.5%
24 - Elton Gallegly 5,977 395 265 2,228 2,888 6.6% 4.4% 37.3% 48.3%
25 - Buck McKeon 4,957 171 188 1,497 1,856 3.4% 3.8% 30.2% 37.4%
26 - David Dreier 6,414 630 505 1,552 2,687 9.8% 7.9% 24.2% 41.9%
27 - Brad Sherman 3,689 312 309 1,248 1,869 8.5% 8.4% 33.8% 50.7%
28 - Howard L. Berman 3,366 260 279 1,007 1,546 7.7% 8.3% 29.9% 45.9%
29 - Adam B. Schiff 5,758 518 458 1,951 2,927 9.0% 8.0% 33.9% 50.8%
30 - Henry A. Waxman 4,547 629 299 1,766 2,694 13.8% 6.6% 38.8% 59.2%
31 - Xavier Becerra 2,144 171 231 570 972 8.0% 10.8% 26.6% 45.3%
32 - Judy Chu 5,376 300 457 1,297 2,054 5.6% 8.5% 24.1% 38.2%
33 - Karen Bass 3,932 231 395 1,290 1,916 5.9% 10.0% 32.8% 48.7%
34 - Lucille Roybal-Allard 5,831 185 461 1,295 1,941 3.2% 7.9% 22.2% 33.3%
35 - Maxine Waters 3,232 141 359 1,106 1,606 4.4% 11.1% 34.2% 49.7%
36 -  Vacant District 36 4,138 430 318 1,547 2,295 10.4% 7.7% 37.4% 55.5%
37 - Laura Richardson 3,472 215 308 1,032 1,555 6.2% 8.9% 29.7% 44.8%
38 - Grace F. Napolitano 6,344 357 532 1,605 2,494 5.6% 8.4% 25.3% 39.3%
39 - Linda T. Sánchez 5,703 367 477 1,653 2,497 6.4% 8.4% 29.0% 43.8%
40 - Edward R. Royce 5,822 462 467 1,858 2,787 7.9% 8.0% 31.9% 47.9%
41 - Jerry Lewis 4,903 172 266 1,467 1,905 3.5% 5.4% 29.9% 38.9%
42 - Gary G. Miller 5,363 497 494 1,446 2,437 9.3% 9.2% 27.0% 45.4%
43 - Joe Baca 4,723 130 313 1,095 1,538 2.8% 6.6% 23.2% 32.6%
44 - Ken Calvert 4,800 342 265 1,194 1,801 7.1% 5.5% 24.9% 37.5%
45 - Mary Bono Mack 4,679 231 145 512 888 4.9% 3.1% 10.9% 19.0%
46 - Dana Rohrabacher 5,741 524 357 2,322 3,203 9.1% 6.2% 40.4% 55.8%
47 - Loretta Sanchez 4,233 203 229 1,688 2,120 4.8% 5.4% 39.9% 50.1%
48 - John Campbell 4,988 643 330 1,706 2,679 12.9% 6.6% 34.2% 53.7%
49 - Darrell E. Issa 3,545 158 126 972 1,256 4.5% 3.6% 27.4% 35.4%
50 - Brian P. Bilbray 5,480 480 386 1,848 2,714 8.8% 7.0% 33.7% 49.5%
51 - Bob Filner 5,811 321 444 1,745 2,510 5.5% 7.6% 30.0% 43.2%
52 - Duncan Hunter 5,351 329 408 2,106 2,843 6.1% 7.6% 39.4% 53.1%
53 - Susan Davis 3,326 214 249 879 1,342 6.4% 7.5% 26.4% 40.3%
Statewide Total 252,785 16,436 18,740 82,484 117,660 6.5% 7.4% 32.6% 46.5%
Other College-Going Rate Options

College-Going Rates Menu

 

Looking for other Commission data?

Visit Where to Find Data for quick links sorted by the type of data.

Want to reproduce a pre-configured data report?

Visit Reproduce Pre-Configured Report for available instructions.

Instructions for the following report(s) on this page are available:

How to Cite this Information

See Citing Information on the Terms of Use page for some suggestions.

See something weird?

Known problems and notes about the data are documented on the Caveats page. Please let us know if you notice something that is not included. Send an e-mail to Data_Quality@cpec.ca.gov or fill out the Comments form.