Skip to: Content | Footer

California Postsecondary Education Data Home Page

College-Going Rates by Congressional District

1995 College-Going Rates to Public Colleges and Universities

This table provides college-going rates for Congressional districts in California. College-going rates were calculated by dividing the number of entering students from public schools in the district by the total number of graduates from public schools in the district. All categories of public schools are covered including comprehensive schools, continuation schools, and other categories of schools. Students with unknown genders and ethnicities and those from unknown schools were excluded from the data.

Data regarding high school graduates were obtained from the California Department of Education. Data for higher education enrollment were obtained from each of the segments and includes all students -- full-time, part-time, credit, and non-credit.

Note that the calculation of these rates is based on totals for each category such as year, district, and ethnicity. Rates do not entail longitudinal tracking of individual students.

Click on the column label for one of the public systems to see a chart of the data below.

Click on the the district number and member for a chart showing the trend over time for that district..

Important note: The data for first-time students have changed. See Changes to First-Time Freshmen and College-Going Data for more details.

Data collection for Fall 2009 is in progress. As a result, more recent data than what is displayed may be available for some systems. Visit the Custom Data Reports for the most up-to-date data. Select the year needed from the drop-down list at the top of the options. Visit the Dates Available for availability for each type of data. The Sources and Timing of Data page has an approximate schedule for each type of data the Commission collects.

  High School
Graduates
First-Time Students College-Going Rate
Congressional District Public UC CSU CCC Total UC CSU CCC Total
1 - Mike Thompson 5,495 319 424 1,805 2,548 5.8% 7.7% 32.8% 46.4%
2 - Wally Herger 5,744 154 421 1,661 2,236 2.7% 7.3% 28.9% 38.9%
3 - Daniel E. Lungren 5,123 282 390 2,008 2,680 5.5% 7.6% 39.2% 52.3%
4 - Tom McClintock 5,867 221 406 2,026 2,653 3.8% 6.9% 34.5% 45.2%
5 - Doris O. Matsui 3,611 180 297 1,434 1,911 5.0% 8.2% 39.7% 52.9%
6 - Lynn C. Woolsey 4,148 344 293 1,693 2,330 8.3% 7.1% 40.8% 56.2%
7 - George Miller 4,406 227 278 1,539 2,044 5.2% 6.3% 34.9% 46.4%
8 - Nancy Pelosi 2,056 199 423 616 1,238 9.7% 20.6% 30.0% 60.2%
9 - Barbara Lee 3,171 324 334 1,155 1,813 10.2% 10.5% 36.4% 57.2%
10 - John Garamendi 5,278 471 399 1,833 2,703 8.9% 7.6% 34.7% 51.2%
11 - Jerry McNerney 6,299 402 463 2,466 3,331 6.4% 7.4% 39.1% 52.9%
12 - Jackie Speier 4,850 522 441 2,101 3,064 10.8% 9.1% 43.3% 63.2%
13 - Fortney Pete Stark 5,146 389 474 1,865 2,728 7.6% 9.2% 36.2% 53.0%
14 - Anna G. Eshoo 3,441 441 290 1,124 1,855 12.8% 8.4% 32.7% 53.9%
15 - Michael M. Honda 5,368 532 417 2,344 3,293 9.9% 7.8% 43.7% 61.3%
16 - Zoe Lofgren 4,788 302 543 1,677 2,522 6.3% 11.3% 35.0% 52.7%
17 - Sam Farr 4,574 277 362 1,804 2,443 6.1% 7.9% 39.4% 53.4%
18 - Dennis A. Cardoza 5,680 146 341 2,084 2,571 2.6% 6.0% 36.7% 45.3%
19 - Jeff Denham 5,891 212 570 2,078 2,860 3.6% 9.7% 35.3% 48.5%
20 - Jim Costa 4,991 105 403 1,686 2,194 2.1% 8.1% 33.8% 44.0%
21 - Devin Nunes 6,294 177 506 2,615 3,298 2.8% 8.0% 41.5% 52.4%
22 - Kevin McCarthy 5,844 152 373 1,600 2,125 2.6% 6.4% 27.4% 36.4%
23 - Lois Capps 3,677 222 177 1,761 2,160 6.0% 4.8% 47.9% 58.7%
24 - Elton Gallegly 5,961 380 288 2,301 2,969 6.4% 4.8% 38.6% 49.8%
25 - Buck McKeon 5,130 205 211 1,783 2,199 4.0% 4.1% 34.8% 42.9%
26 - David Dreier 6,441 679 626 2,012 3,317 10.5% 9.7% 31.2% 51.5%
27 - Brad Sherman 3,477 321 365 1,203 1,889 9.2% 10.5% 34.6% 54.3%
28 - Howard L. Berman 3,420 277 339 962 1,578 8.1% 9.9% 28.1% 46.1%
29 - Adam B. Schiff 5,278 505 425 2,106 3,036 9.6% 8.1% 39.9% 57.5%
30 - Henry A. Waxman 4,507 536 359 1,709 2,604 11.9% 8.0% 37.9% 57.8%
31 - Xavier Becerra 2,263 109 296 536 941 4.8% 13.1% 23.7% 41.6%
32 - Judy Chu 5,420 293 482 1,588 2,363 5.4% 8.9% 29.3% 43.6%
33 - Karen Bass 3,700 203 361 1,272 1,836 5.5% 9.8% 34.4% 49.6%
34 - Lucille Roybal-Allard 5,513 300 434 1,352 2,086 5.4% 7.9% 24.5% 37.8%
35 - Maxine Waters 3,379 112 394 1,106 1,612 3.3% 11.7% 32.7% 47.7%
36 -  Vacant District 36 4,150 383 348 1,529 2,260 9.2% 8.4% 36.8% 54.5%
37 - Laura Richardson 3,549 210 311 1,485 2,006 5.9% 8.8% 41.8% 56.5%
38 - Grace F. Napolitano 6,360 334 511 1,806 2,651 5.3% 8.0% 28.4% 41.7%
39 - Linda T. Sánchez 5,444 376 466 1,719 2,561 6.9% 8.6% 31.6% 47.0%
40 - Edward R. Royce 5,633 496 510 1,762 2,768 8.8% 9.1% 31.3% 49.1%
41 - Jerry Lewis 5,097 194 279 706 1,179 3.8% 5.5% 13.9% 23.1%
42 - Gary G. Miller 5,527 565 635 1,563 2,763 10.2% 11.5% 28.3% 50.0%
43 - Joe Baca 5,075 185 324 875 1,384 3.6% 6.4% 17.2% 27.3%
44 - Ken Calvert 5,037 384 333 1,222 1,939 7.6% 6.6% 24.3% 38.5%
45 - Mary Bono Mack 4,829 232 215 592 1,039 4.8% 4.5% 12.3% 21.5%
46 - Dana Rohrabacher 5,560 500 339 2,469 3,308 9.0% 6.1% 44.4% 59.5%
47 - Loretta Sanchez 4,059 229 239 2,073 2,541 5.6% 5.9% 51.1% 62.6%
48 - John Campbell 5,045 711 321 1,650 2,682 14.1% 6.4% 32.7% 53.2%
49 - Darrell E. Issa 3,889 186 223 1,117 1,526 4.8% 5.7% 28.7% 39.2%
50 - Brian P. Bilbray 5,249 568 531 1,755 2,854 10.8% 10.1% 33.4% 54.4%
51 - Bob Filner 5,553 307 503 2,240 3,050 5.5% 9.1% 40.3% 54.9%
52 - Duncan Hunter 5,730 378 521 2,670 3,569 6.6% 9.1% 46.6% 62.3%
53 - Susan Davis 3,158 210 250 966 1,426 6.6% 7.9% 30.6% 45.2%
Statewide Total 255,175 16,968 20,464 87,104 124,536 6.6% 8.0% 34.1% 48.8%
Other College-Going Rate Options

College-Going Rates Menu

 

Looking for other Commission data?

Visit Where to Find Data for quick links sorted by the type of data.

Want to reproduce a pre-configured data report?

Visit Reproduce Pre-Configured Report for available instructions.

Instructions for the following report(s) on this page are available:

How to Cite this Information

See Citing Information on the Terms of Use page for some suggestions.

See something weird?

Known problems and notes about the data are documented on the Caveats page. Please let us know if you notice something that is not included. Send an e-mail to Data_Quality@cpec.ca.gov or fill out the Comments form.