Skip to: Content | Footer

California Postsecondary Education Data Home Page

College-Going Rates by Senate District

2006 College-Going Rates to Public Colleges and Universities

This table provides college-going rates for Senate districts in California. College-going rates were calculated by dividing the number of entering students from public schools in the district by the total number of graduates from public schools in the district. All categories of public schools are covered including comprehensive schools, continuation schools, and other categories of schools. Students with unknown genders and ethnicities and those from unknown schools were excluded from the data.

Data regarding high school graduates were obtained from the California Department of Education. Data for higher education enrollment were obtained from each of the segments and includes all students -- full-time, part-time, credit, and non-credit.

Note that the calculation of these rates is based on totals for each category such as year, district, and ethnicity. Rates do not entail longitudinal tracking of individual students.

Click on the column label for one of the public systems to see a chart of the data below.

Click on the the district number and member for a chart showing the trend over time for that district..

Important note: The data for first-time students have changed. See Changes to First-Time Freshmen and College-Going Data for more details.

Data collection for Fall 2009 is in progress. As a result, more recent data than what is displayed may be available for some systems. Visit the Custom Data Reports for the most up-to-date data. Select the year needed from the drop-down list at the top of the options. Visit the Dates Available for availability for each type of data. The Sources and Timing of Data page has an approximate schedule for each type of data the Commission collects.

  High School
Graduates
First-Time Students College-Going Rate
Senate District Public UC CSU CCC Total UC CSU CCC Total
1 - Ted Gaines 12,022 758 1,409 2,986 5,153 6.3% 11.7% 24.8% 42.9%
2 - Noreen Evans 8,191 512 806 2,610 3,928 6.3% 9.8% 31.9% 48.0%
3 - Mark Leno 4,562 542 553 1,296 2,391 11.9% 12.1% 28.4% 52.4%
4 - Doug LaMalfa 10,484 348 976 1,507 2,831 3.3% 9.3% 14.4% 27.0%
5 - Lois Wolk 9,822 589 877 2,854 4,320 6.0% 8.9% 29.1% 44.0%
6 - Darrell Steinberg 7,289 471 627 2,730 3,828 6.5% 8.6% 37.5% 52.5%
7 - Mark DeSaulnier 9,079 1,111 1,115 844 3,070 12.2% 12.3% 9.3% 33.8%
8 - Leland Y. Yee 7,078 1,352 927 2,205 4,484 19.1% 13.1% 31.2% 63.4%
9 - Loni Hancock 6,153 853 732 2,298 3,883 13.9% 11.9% 37.3% 63.1%
10 - Ellen M. Corbett 7,927 1,164 1,064 2,265 4,493 14.7% 13.4% 28.6% 56.7%
11 - Joe Simitian 7,597 1,226 896 1,785 3,907 16.1% 11.8% 23.5% 51.4%
12 - Anthony Cannella 10,999 405 1,045 2,507 3,957 3.7% 9.5% 22.8% 36.0%
13 - Elaine Alquist 5,563 496 674 1,214 2,384 8.9% 12.1% 21.8% 42.9%
14 - Tom Berryhill 10,338 395 1,233 1,474 3,102 3.8% 11.9% 14.3% 30.0%
15 - Sam Blakeslee 8,975 1,009 1,062 2,544 4,615 11.2% 11.8% 28.3% 51.4%
16 - Michael J. Rubio 9,815 303 1,117 1,182 2,602 3.1% 11.4% 12.0% 26.5%
17 - Sharon Runner 11,896 565 1,038 3,244 4,847 4.7% 8.7% 27.3% 40.7%
18 - Jean Fuller 10,920 351 1,031 3,620 5,002 3.2% 9.4% 33.2% 45.8%
19 - Tony Strickland 9,564 778 871 4,084 5,733 8.1% 9.1% 42.7% 59.9%
20 - Alex Padilla 5,281 385 586 1,918 2,889 7.3% 11.1% 36.3% 54.7%
21 - Carol Liu 7,499 805 838 2,710 4,353 10.7% 11.2% 36.1% 58.0%
22 - Kevin de León 5,752 616 644 1,819 3,079 10.7% 11.2% 31.6% 53.5%
23 - Fran Pavley 6,635 743 610 2,530 3,883 11.2% 9.2% 38.1% 58.5%
24 - Ed Hernandez 8,406 567 869 2,881 4,317 6.7% 10.3% 34.3% 51.4%
25 - Roderick D. Wright 5,453 418 772 1,563 2,753 7.7% 14.2% 28.7% 50.5%
26 - Curren D. Price 3,774 293 543 1,512 2,348 7.8% 14.4% 40.1% 62.2%
27 - Alan S. Lowenthal 9,771 682 1,176 2,364 4,222 7.0% 12.0% 24.2% 43.2%
28 - Ted W. Lieu 7,514 717 980 2,334 4,031 9.5% 13.0% 31.1% 53.6%
29 - Bob Huff 11,586 1,605 1,724 3,929 7,258 13.9% 14.9% 33.9% 62.6%
30 - Ron S. Calderon 9,498 520 1,002 3,129 4,651 5.5% 10.5% 32.9% 49.0%
31 - Robert Dutton 11,472 790 1,237 3,076 5,103 6.9% 10.8% 26.8% 44.5%
32 - Gloria Negrete McLeod 9,398 494 947 2,042 3,483 5.3% 10.1% 21.7% 37.1%
33 - Mimi Walters 8,932 894 1,006 3,430 5,330 10.0% 11.3% 38.4% 59.7%
34 - Lou Correa 7,058 344 547 2,646 3,537 4.9% 7.8% 37.5% 50.1%
35 - Tom Harman 10,366 1,347 1,159 4,018 6,524 13.0% 11.2% 38.8% 62.9%
36 - Joel Anderson 11,394 680 1,359 3,304 5,343 6.0% 11.9% 29.0% 46.9%
37 - Bill Emmerson 8,789 485 677 2,001 3,163 5.5% 7.7% 22.8% 36.0%
38 - Mark Wyland 8,994 638 1,008 2,682 4,328 7.1% 11.2% 29.8% 48.1%
39 - Christine Kehoe 6,998 692 896 1,881 3,469 9.9% 12.8% 26.9% 49.6%
40 - Juan Vargas 10,270 579 1,173 1,767 3,519 5.6% 11.4% 17.2% 34.3%
Statewide Total 343,114 27,522 37,806 96,785 162,113 8.0% 11.0% 28.2% 47.2%
Other College-Going Rate Options

College-Going Rates Menu

 

Looking for other Commission data?

Visit Where to Find Data for quick links sorted by the type of data.

Want to reproduce a pre-configured data report?

Visit Reproduce Pre-Configured Report for available instructions.

Instructions for the following report(s) on this page are available:

How to Cite this Information

See Citing Information on the Terms of Use page for some suggestions.

See something weird?

Known problems and notes about the data are documented on the Caveats page. Please let us know if you notice something that is not included. Send an e-mail to Data_Quality@cpec.ca.gov or fill out the Comments form.